Is Hope Your Worst Enemy?

You’ve told yourself for years that your great idea will take off “when the time is right.” You refresh your email, waiting for the one reply, the one market shift, the one burst of motivation that will save you. You call this hope. It feels gentle, but it keeps you from moving.

This isn’t an invitation to despair; it’s a call to clarity. When hope is born of desperation, it numbs; desire, by contrast, moves. We often mistake hope or expectation for desire, and that confusion stalls our lives. Only "Desire" drives action when the outcome is uncertain.

The Trap of Expectation: A Contract the World Never Signed

Expectation is a private contract you write with reality without telling reality. “If I work hard, I’ll be promoted by June.” When June passes, you feel robbed; the bill you mailed to the universe comes back stamped: no such account. Expectation addresses an imagined guarantor of order; call it the Cosmic Guarantor: God, the market, fate, Lacan’s “Big Other.” You’re appealing to an addressee that cannot answer. That is why expectation corrodes: it turns effort into entitlement and time into debt, and the longer you wait, the more the world “owes” you in a currency it never agreed to use.

The Sugar That Numbs: Optimism

Optimism is the sugar that makes this contract go down. It promises the invoice will clear soon. “Just a little longer;  next month things will turn.” That sweetness postpones mourning and postpones action. Fantasies about a better future crowd out the choices that could actually change today. Little by little, you stop testing reality and start negotiating with a fiction.

Keep postponing contact with reality and you stack tiny betrayals. “Life owes me” sours into “Life failed me”; then into private theologies: “God is punishing me,” “I have bad luck,” “I’m cursed”, and finally curdles into “I failed; I always will.” The heaviness that follows isn’t ordinary sadness; it’s the collapse that arrives when the universe finally returns your stack of unpaid invoices stamped insufficient funds. Closing accounts quickly isn’t coldness; it’s how desire stays mobile.

The Antidote: Desire as Purpose-Driven Action

Desire, understood as purpose-driven action, does not wait for the world to co-sign your life. It is not a wish whispered to the ceiling but a stance you take once guarantees are stripped away. When Lacan says “do not give up on your desire,” the instruction isn’t to believe harder or embrace a comforting fiction; it’s to act from what matters even when no return is promised. Desire is your core orientation, the through-line of your talent and aliveness. It moves soberly. It chooses, it risks, it learns. It is anti-sedative. Desire is not expectation, and it is not hope.

How do you live in that space of desire, where there are no guarantees? This is where you build a pragmatic backbone, the kind the Stoics drilled. Rehearse what can go wrong so you’re not shocked when it does. Divide the field into what is yours to do and what belongs to the weather of the world, and measure yourself only by the first. This isn’t doom; it’s the removal of surprise. Once the friction has a name, you meet it without theatrics. You can’t force a yes, but you can place yourself where a real answer can happen.

Purpose-driven action makes cuts. It trims the fat of fantasy timelines and replaces them with short, honest encounters with reality. Instead of hoping your work will be noticed “when the time is right,” you set a date, show the work, and treat the reply as data. Instead of waiting for a relationship to “settle down,” you state the boundary you can live by and then live by it. Instead of promising yourself that creative time will appear, you give the work a daily home (however small) and you protect that space from negotiation. Each cut refuses anesthesia. Each cut returns the day to you.

This rhythm sharpens when you decide in advance what will count as enough to continue and what will count as a clean stop. Write those thresholds before emotions get involved. If the response is dead after a fair test, you close the file and mourn promptly; letting the loss be a loss frees desire from yesterday’s promise. If there is a living signal, you double your attention and carry it forward. In both cases you stay in conversation with reality rather than with the imaginary guarantor you once addressed like a cosmic parent.

The structural shift, in plain terms, is this: you stop addressing the Cosmic Guarantor and demanding a guarantee, and you start acting from desire without one. In Lacanian shorthand, that’s a move from S → A, the subject appealing (S) to the Big Other (A), to $ ◊ a: the barred subject ($), conscious of lack, oriented by objet a (the cause of desire). You don’t need the symbols to live the ethic. The point is clear: stop asking permission from a universe that cannot answer; take the next true step because it is yours to take.

Hope, as a mood, is not the enemy. Its narcotic version is: the one that postpones decisions and keeps you negotiating with an absent addressee. Purpose-driven action breaks that negotiation. It trades the soft comfort of “soon” for the steadier comfort of craft: specific aims, short cycles, honest feedback, and the quiet courage to keep moving without guarantees. Nothing is owed. You act anyway. That is not bitterness. That is sovereignty.

So make the first cut today. By cut I mean a single concrete decision that creates a before and after and invites a real answer from the world. Take the quietest and most persistent wish you have been waiting to resolve itself. Name it plainly. Now choose one physical action you can take in the next forty eight hours that will generate a real response, a yes, a no, data, or friction. Not a thought. An action. Send the email. Book the conversation. Publish the paragraph. Take a step toward freedom. Once the world answers, learn, adjust, and continue. Then make the next cut.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unmasking Evil: The Truth Behind Our Darkest Desires

Image
Evil, as an action, could be a thought, but that is usually forgotten, a damned intranscendent mental Sin. In general, evil is only evil when it becomes action and comes out of us as a manifestation of our darkness. But, as an action, it is not inherently evil; rather, it is evil only in relation to other actions or, better yet, perceptions of actions—interpretations. Above all, evil is a function of one's relationship with one's manque, the fundamental lack that structures one's desire. Most of the time, what is evil is not determined by an external reaction, but by the accusation of one's inner Other, nor by the moral codifications that attempt to define it. Rather, evil’s true weight emerges in the subjective coordinates of one's own lack, in how one's act situates itself in relation to this void that constitutes one. In Lacanian psychoanalysis, the subject is always structured around the manque-à-être—the lack of being. It is this absence that fuels desire, ...
Read more

The Anxious Cat: The Case of Q

Image
Everybody who has had pets knows that they all have unique personalities, fears, and desires, and in some cases, they can experience emotions such as shame, guilt, playfulness, and anxiety. I have been living with a cat for some time now. During this period, I have learned to understand him beyond his normal behavior; I can recognize when he is anxious. In Lacanian psychoanalysis, anxiety arises from the delicate and ever-shifting interplay between three fundamental registers of human psyche: the Imaginary, the Symbolic, and the Real. The inherent tension and potential for disruption within their interconnectedness generate anxiety. Here's a brief breakdown: The Imaginary: This realm encompasses identification, the ego, and the formation of the self through specular images and identifications with others. It is where we develop a sense of bodily unity and coherence, primarily during the mirror stage, when an infant recognizes themselves in the mirror. This sense of self, however,...
Read more

The Cat F. and her object of desire

Image
There is a toy the cat I live with, F., loves. A small, insignificant object by itself—a hair band—but for her, it is everything. She plays with it, run with it, and then—loses it. Again and again, it disappears under the sofa. At first, I thought it was mere accident, an unfortunate consequence of her wild enthusiasm. I would retrieve it (with difficulty, moving the whole big and heavy sofa), place it back in front of her, and she would resume the game. Then I noticed something strange: F. was not merely losing the toy—she was hiding it, pushing it carefully under the sofa and then wait. Not searching for it, not retrieving it herself, but waiting for it to come out, like a mouse. This is the game. Not the toy, not the having of it, but the not having it—the game of waiting. Lacan taught us that desire is not for the object itself, but for the dream of having it, and the wonderful things that it will make us feel. The objet petit a , that little elusive remainder, is not what we want...
Read more