The Pulsating Psyche: How the Real, the Symbolic, and the Imaginary Breathe Through Life

Our experience is not a motionless stone but a pulse: it beats with the weather of the day, with the moods that visit us, with those invisible laws that the tribe we inhabit has tattooed upon us. We almost never dwell in the calm center of the Symbolic Man (Figure 1), that knot where Law, Desire, and Lack hold one another without strangling, three taut ropes that never quite snap.

Figure 1.

Some are born upon ground that does not give way under the weight of life: firm frameworks, names that do not betray, a horizon with fewer ghosts. But the art of remaining in that center is not inheritance, it is craft. For a few, resilience rises naturally, like those toys that always right themselves no matter how hard they’re struck; for most of us, the work is humbler and nobler: to return, again and again, each time life throws us off balance—to mend while we walk.

Freud heard the drum; Lacan wrote the score. We make the music through the three registers of the psyche:

  • Imaginary: the realm of mirrors and identification; the “I see it, therefore I know.”

  • Symbolic: the architecture of words, roles, and law; the weave that locates and binds us, the one that says “if I can name it, it exists.”

  • Real: that which never fits the dictionary; trauma, accident, the hole that interrupts meaning.

In the diagrams that follow, each register is a sphere that expands and contracts. The dotted triangle of LAW (L), DESIRE (D), and LACK (K) is the stage on which they dance. When one sphere grows too large, the others give way: the shape strains, the voice changes.

Law sets the measure of the world. Desire is the fever for something else. Lack is the hollow that sets us in motion. Running through them is jouissance—not quiet pleasure but excess, that satisfaction that sometimes hurts—spinning around the impossible object of desire, the object a, small as a point yet voracious as a black hole. Around it, jouissance takes on colors: CDJ (the bodily drive), Jφ (the phallic satisfaction of performance and possession), and JA (the devotional glow of pleasing the Other).

Between these petals nest three thorns that mark our days: anxiety, when the body brushes against the image; inhibition, when Law presses too hard; and the symptom, when we invent a “solution” that does not solve and yet returns again and again, bringing a strange peace (Figure 1).

Two pulses underlie it all (Freud knew this: Eros, which binds and weaves, and Thanatos), which unravels and pushes toward discharge. The Greeks sang it as the tension between moîra (measure, destiny) and hýbris (excess). Nietzsche dreamed it as a pair: Apollo; form, limit, symbol and Dionysus, body, excess, ecstasy. Our psyche is their battlefield, and their reconciliation.

With this map in hand, let us enter three everyday scenes.

I. A Room Called Loss — The Wound of the Real

With just one word, you can collapse the world.

In the Tragedy diagram, the Real grows heavy as lead. It thickens, fills the air. The Imaginary becomes crowded with fixed scenes: the empty chair, the silent phone, the door that no longer opens. The Symbolic shrinks to the bone: words turn hollow, rituals lose their edge, the hours lose meaning (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

The mind goes begging for meaning: it explains, bargains, tries to strike pacts with fate, with God, with the devil. The body, meanwhile, enters CDJ; broken sleep, erratic appetite, that restless agitation that moves from room to room seeking ground. Inhibition thins; one would give anything to rescue what was lost. Anxiety blooms at the seam where image wounds body; where the Symbolic whispers stubbornly: “it should have been different.”

The symptom takes the stage: repetition, search, verification; again and again. And the hysteric’s question rises, sharp and unanswerable: “What am I to the desire of the Other, now that the beloved, the job, the dreamed future is gone?”

If the foundations were strong, the knot holds, and pain finds a rhythm that allows return. If not, the exposed corner of Lack summons older ruins: without the stabilizing function of the Name-of-the-Father, the compass loses its magnet. The present loss awakens the first one. As in Oedipus, it is not that destiny begins today; it is that the play reveals what was written in the structure all along.

II. The Office Where Law Becomes Tyranny — The Weight of the Symbolic

There are days when a single monster devours the air.

Deadlines loom; procedures multiply; inhibition rules. No one does what they wish; everyone circles the fantasy of pleasing the Other. Anxiety stings at every anomaly: a number that won’t balance, an ambiguous email, a missing signature. The symptom becomes predictable: lists to verify lists, polish upon polish until the task lies buried beneath sterile perfection.

This is the Master’s Discourse in motion. An S1 commands; “productivity,” “efficiency,” “on time.” The worker, the barred subject ($), wears thin in silence. The object a becomes the surplus satisfaction: the glow of not failing under the judging gaze.

The circuit feeds on Jφ, the jouissance of performance, rank, and measurement. Sleep debt and bodily tension pulse with CDJ. And on the map’s edge, a Real needle pricks the Law with every unforeseen event (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

The obsessive question hovers over every head: “Could I lose my job?” No metric can answer it. Recognition piles up like sand, and the loop resumes. Thanatos applauds the repetition. Eros must intervene; to draw a line between done and perfect, to sketch the process so the Imaginary can soften the Law, to make one real-world test. It is not about defying order, but about giving measure to Law so that language serves life, not consumes it.

III. The Cliff Called Desire — The Assault of the Imaginary

And suddenly, the body ignites.

In Sexual Arousal (Figure 4), the Imaginary becomes a lighthouse: the body as image, magnetism, rhythm. A tiny lure (the object a in the form of a look, a voice, a scent) captures attention. Fantasy builds the scene, and jouissance begins to orbit that impossible object. It can never be reached; such is the structure of desire.

Figure 4.

The drive pushes and finds its limit in the Real through orgasmic discharge. Thanatos takes his tax, and the circuit restarts. Inhibition thins (as it should in the realm of sex) but the Symbolic cannot vanish. It must, at least, provide a minimal grammar: consent, boundaries, shared meaning. With that anchoring, JA (the jouissance of the Other) and Jφ (phallic jouissance) can become intense yet intelligible; they do not exclude one another, they align.

The diagram speaks plainly: sex is rarely “about sex.” It is the staging of a fantasy around the object a, often drifting toward the corner of perversion; in Lacan’s technical sense, where the subject takes the place of Law and, in that gesture, seeks to be seen, noticed, recognized, proven to exist. Again and again the game closes the circuit; through the desire of the Other (JA), through the phallic shine of conquest (Jφ), and through the bodily jouissance (CDJ) that discharges into the Real.

When the Symbolic thins too far, the symptom appears: a compulsive sexual routine that promises relief and only repeats the scene with new costumes, new actors, the same script.

The Art of Returning

If you listen closely, you’ll hear the rhythm.

Morning: the Imaginary rises; mirrors, screens, plans.
Midday: the Symbolic dominates; roles, metrics, emails.
Night: the Real enters; fatigue, news, unprocessed memory.

It isn’t pathology; it’s pulse. The craft is to notice which register holds the baton, to feel where the seam is heating, and to choose, for this hour, the stitch that balances Real, Symbolic, and Imaginary.

That’s why the first image matters. The Symbolic Man is no idol; it’s a beacon. We do not live in equilibrium; we return to it. Like Sisyphus finding meaning in ascent; like Nietzsche’s eternal return, where affirming the cycle (even the pain) is to affirm life itself. Some days we return three times before lunch; others, there is no lunch at all.

The secret is not willpower, but technique:
an honest phrase that names the unnamable;
a line that renders abstract law graspable;
a test that lets the Real speak;
a breath that brings the body back into time.

The psyche is not a problem to “fix,” but a fabric in perpetual weaving. When one circle swells, you do not need a new identity or another theory; you need a counterweight.
If the Real grows heavy, lean on the Imaginary and Symbolic; images, words, shared names that sustain you.
If the Symbolic suffocates, give yourself art, play, and expression so that the Imaginary can breathe.

Give time to the work. Time does not erase; it softens and ties.
With patience, the knot holds again.


☕ If this post touched you and you’d like to support my work, you can invite me to a coffee:
ko-fi.com/maxsegali
Your support helps me keep writing, drawing, and weaving reflections that bridge psyche, art, and life.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unmasking Evil: The Truth Behind Our Darkest Desires

Image
Evil, as an action, could be a thought, but that is usually forgotten, a damned intranscendent mental Sin. In general, evil is only evil when it becomes action and comes out of us as a manifestation of our darkness. But, as an action, it is not inherently evil; rather, it is evil only in relation to other actions or, better yet, perceptions of actions—interpretations. Above all, evil is a function of one's relationship with one's manque, the fundamental lack that structures one's desire. Most of the time, what is evil is not determined by an external reaction, but by the accusation of one's inner Other, nor by the moral codifications that attempt to define it. Rather, evil’s true weight emerges in the subjective coordinates of one's own lack, in how one's act situates itself in relation to this void that constitutes one. In Lacanian psychoanalysis, the subject is always structured around the manque-à-être—the lack of being. It is this absence that fuels desire, ...
Read more

The Anxious Cat: The Case of Q

Image
Everybody who has had pets knows that they all have unique personalities, fears, and desires, and in some cases, they can experience emotions such as shame, guilt, playfulness, and anxiety. I have been living with a cat for some time now. During this period, I have learned to understand him beyond his normal behavior; I can recognize when he is anxious. In Lacanian psychoanalysis, anxiety arises from the delicate and ever-shifting interplay between three fundamental registers of human psyche: the Imaginary, the Symbolic, and the Real. The inherent tension and potential for disruption within their interconnectedness generate anxiety. Here's a brief breakdown: The Imaginary: This realm encompasses identification, the ego, and the formation of the self through specular images and identifications with others. It is where we develop a sense of bodily unity and coherence, primarily during the mirror stage, when an infant recognizes themselves in the mirror. This sense of self, however,...
Read more

The Cat F. and her object of desire

Image
There is a toy the cat I live with, F., loves. A small, insignificant object by itself—a hair band—but for her, it is everything. She plays with it, run with it, and then—loses it. Again and again, it disappears under the sofa. At first, I thought it was mere accident, an unfortunate consequence of her wild enthusiasm. I would retrieve it (with difficulty, moving the whole big and heavy sofa), place it back in front of her, and she would resume the game. Then I noticed something strange: F. was not merely losing the toy—she was hiding it, pushing it carefully under the sofa and then wait. Not searching for it, not retrieving it herself, but waiting for it to come out, like a mouse. This is the game. Not the toy, not the having of it, but the not having it—the game of waiting. Lacan taught us that desire is not for the object itself, but for the dream of having it, and the wonderful things that it will make us feel. The objet petit a , that little elusive remainder, is not what we want...
Read more