Couples Are Not Made of Two People


Most conversations about couples start from the wrong place.

They ask whether two people are compatible, whether they fit, whether they share values, interests, opinions, beliefs, or communication styles. As if a relationship were a puzzle where the right pieces simply lock into place and remain there.

But what we encounter in a couple is not simply another person. What we encounter is another structure.

Attraction does not follow fixed rules. Sometimes we are drawn to what mirrors us. Not only physically, although that happens more often than we like to admit, but structurally. We recognize our own way of desiring, believing, thinking, or suffering in the other. We love ourselves through them. At other times we are drawn to the opposite. To what transgresses our limits, unsettles our certainties, or embodies what we have renounced or cannot allow ourselves to be. Both movements coexist, and neither guarantees harmony.

Each of us arrives already organized around certain ways of relating to law, desire, and lack. We come with habits of seeking certainty or provoking movement, of stabilizing meaning or opening it. These are not conscious strategies. They are ways of regulating what is missing, what feels excessive, and what must hold in order for life to remain livable.

When two people meet, harmony is rarely what appears first. What appears is tension, resonance, misalignment, or sometimes an immediate sense of recognition. Something clicks, or something resists. That reaction usually says more about structure than about personality, values, or intentions.

This is why couples so often oscillate between fascination and exhaustion. The same difference that attracts can later feel unbearable. The same similarity that reassures can slowly suffocate desire. What initially felt like destiny may later feel like repetition.

Rather than asking whether a couple works, a more precise question is how two structures interact.

To explore this, I developed a simple interactive tool based on a triangular model of Law, Desire, and Lack, inspired by Lacanian theory. The triangle is not a diagnosis and it does not explain anyone. It simply places a position. It shows where someone tends to lean when dealing with rules, transgression, stress, and with what cannot be completed or resolved.

You can explore your own position using the Law Desire Lack triangle test here
https://www.lacanianonline.com/2025/09/test-your-psychic-structure-where-do_78.html

On its own, the triangle already tells something important. It shows what you tend to protect, what you tend to push, and where you leave things open. But its real interest appears when two such positions are placed together.

That is where couples begin.

The Couple Map tool allows two people to paste their triangle results and see both points in the same space. What appears is not a verdict, but a geometry. Distance. Mirroring. Complementarity. Friction.

Sometimes two people occupy nearby positions. This often brings stability and mutual understanding, but it can also bring stagnation. Sometimes the distance is large. That can generate excitement and creativity, but also repeated misunderstanding. In certain cases the positions mirror each other. One holds what the other lacks, and vice versa. These pairings can feel deeply compelling, almost inevitable, but they also require translation to avoid capture, dependency, or resentment.

The Couple Map does not say whether a couple should exist. It does not predict success or failure. It shows what kind of work the relationship is already doing, often without knowing it.

You can explore the Couple Map here
https://www.lacanianonline.com/2025/12/lacanian-couple-map-v-10.html

What matters is not to use these tools to label oneself or the other. Their value lies in shifting the question. From who is right to what structure is at play here. From why are we incompatible to what keeps repeating between us.

A couple is not a merger. It is a dynamic system that produces meaning, conflict, and desire in specific ways that is evolving with time. Seeing that structure does not solve anything by itself. But it can create a small gap. And sometimes, that gap is exactly where something new becomes possible.

...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unmasking Evil: The Truth Behind Our Darkest Desires

Image
Evil, as an action, could be a thought, but that is usually forgotten, a damned intranscendent mental Sin. In general, evil is only evil when it becomes action and comes out of us as a manifestation of our darkness. But, as an action, it is not inherently evil; rather, it is evil only in relation to other actions or, better yet, perceptions of actions—interpretations. Above all, evil is a function of one's relationship with one's manque, the fundamental lack that structures one's desire. Most of the time, what is evil is not determined by an external reaction, but by the accusation of one's inner Other, nor by the moral codifications that attempt to define it. Rather, evil’s true weight emerges in the subjective coordinates of one's own lack, in how one's act situates itself in relation to this void that constitutes one. In Lacanian psychoanalysis, the subject is always structured around the manque-à-être—the lack of being. It is this absence that fuels desire, ...
Read more

The Anxious Cat: The Case of Q

Image
Everybody who has had pets knows that they all have unique personalities, fears, and desires, and in some cases, they can experience emotions such as shame, guilt, playfulness, and anxiety. I have been living with a cat for some time now. During this period, I have learned to understand him beyond his normal behavior; I can recognize when he is anxious. In Lacanian psychoanalysis, anxiety arises from the delicate and ever-shifting interplay between three fundamental registers of human psyche: the Imaginary, the Symbolic, and the Real. The inherent tension and potential for disruption within their interconnectedness generate anxiety. Here's a brief breakdown: The Imaginary: This realm encompasses identification, the ego, and the formation of the self through specular images and identifications with others. It is where we develop a sense of bodily unity and coherence, primarily during the mirror stage, when an infant recognizes themselves in the mirror. This sense of self, however,...
Read more

The Cat F. and her object of desire

Image
There is a toy the cat I live with, F., loves. A small, insignificant object by itself—a hair band—but for her, it is everything. She plays with it, run with it, and then—loses it. Again and again, it disappears under the sofa. At first, I thought it was mere accident, an unfortunate consequence of her wild enthusiasm. I would retrieve it (with difficulty, moving the whole big and heavy sofa), place it back in front of her, and she would resume the game. Then I noticed something strange: F. was not merely losing the toy—she was hiding it, pushing it carefully under the sofa and then wait. Not searching for it, not retrieving it herself, but waiting for it to come out, like a mouse. This is the game. Not the toy, not the having of it, but the not having it—the game of waiting. Lacan taught us that desire is not for the object itself, but for the dream of having it, and the wonderful things that it will make us feel. The objet petit a , that little elusive remainder, is not what we want...
Read more